Tech-Hounds.com

Because gamers play games, not benchmarks




The results:

F.E.A.R - Performance Test, 1024 x 768
X1950 Pro Catalyst 7.2
X1950 Pro Catalyst 7.3
Crossfire - Adv - Catalyst 7.2
Crossfire - Std - Catalyst 7.2
Crossfire - Adv - Catalyst 7.3
Crossfire - Std - Catalyst 7.3
43
117.01
289
31 (4x AA 16x AF)
80.55 (4x AA 16x AF)
225 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
43
116.4
285
31 (4x AA 16x AF)
77.35 (4x AA 16x AF)
196 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
60
148.51
369
28 (4x AA 16x AF)
81.95 (4x AA 16x AF)
224 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
62
150.77
362
26 (4x AA 16x AF)
80.68 (4x AA 16x AF)
211 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
59
150.39
369
26 (4x AA 16x AF)
83.73 (4x AA 16x AF)
225 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
62
150.77
362
26 (4x AA 16x AF)
80.68 (4x AA 16x AF)
211 (4x AA 16x AF)
F.E.A.R - Performance Test, 1280 x 960
X1950 Pro Catalyst 7.2
X1950 Pro Catalyst 7.3
Crossfire - Adv - Catalyst 7.2
Crossfire - Std - Catalyst 7.2
Crossfire - Adv - Catalyst 7.3
Crossfire - Std - Catalyst 7.3
35
87.67
202
25 (4x AA 16x AF)
56.28 (4x AA 16x AF)
135 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
36
87.76
204
21 (4x AA 16x AF)
55.51 (4x AA 16x AF)
133 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
41
106.68
247
20 (4x AA 16x AF)
63.58 (4x AA 16x AF)
201 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
39
106.53
241
20 (4x AA 16x AF)
59.38 (4x AA 16x AF)
150 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
38
107.23
246
18 (4x AA 16x AF)
60.62 (4x AA 16x AF)
157 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
39
106.53
241
20 (4x AA 16x AF)
59.38 (4x AA 16x AF)
150 (4x AA 16x AF)
F.E.A.R - Performance Test. 1600 x 1200
X1950 Pro Catalyst 7.2
X1950 Pro Catalyst 7.3
Crossfire - Adv - Catalyst 7.2
Crossfire - Std - Catalyst 7.2
Crossfire - Adv - Catalyst 7.3
Crossfire - Std - Catalyst 7.3
27
61.98
134
16 (4x AA 16x AF)
38.28 (4x AA 16x AF)
88 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
26
61.65
136
18 (4x AA 16x AF)
36.73 (4x AA 16x AF)
18 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
25
91.51
216
8 (4x AA 16x AF)
45.26 (4x AA 16x AF)
123 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
25
89.82
215
9 (4x AA 16x AF)
45.55 (4x AA 16x AF)
124 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
25
89.49
218
8 (4x AA 16x AF)
44.76 (4x AA 16x AF)
121 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
25
89.82
215
9 (4x AA 16x AF)
45.55 (4x AA 16x AF)
124 (4x AA 16x AF)

Obviously, Crossfire has some performance issues with F.E.A.R. Although on average we see an increase in frame rates, we also notice much lower minimum fps - 26 to 28 fps compared to 31 fps we saw with single card setups. Gameplay testing sessions confirms that Crossfire has trouble with some parts of the game. The frame rates near the checkpoint in the Afterimage level (between ATC and Replica forces with mobile armor) are very much unplayable.

F.E.A.R - Performance Test, 1024 x 768, 32 bit fps Progress
123 fps
82 fps
41 fps
0 fps
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

FEAR Performance Test 1024
(click here for a more detailed graph)


Crossfire Single X1950 Pro
<30 fps 1 0
30-45 fps 4 10
45-60 fps 7 15
60-90 fps 23 18
90-120 fps 13 3
>120 fps 7 9
Total 55 55

results are in seconds

Click at the detailed graph and you'll see see the problem lies near the end of the performance point - the explosion on the last room. As we have said repeatedly, minimum frame rates when you play the game tend to be much lower than what you saw in F.E.A.R Performance Test. You'll want minimum frame rates around 35 to 40 fps for a fluid gameplay experience. A Crossfire setup is unable to deliver such experience, though a single card setup can. Obviously, AMD have issues to sort out with Crossfire and F.E.A.R.

[Previous Page]
[Go to top]
[Next Page]
Disclaimer and Privacy policy.