SuperPi 8M Results
Generally speaking, latencies between the two chipsets - P965 and P35 - are pretty similar. at default FSBs of each respective processor. Twiddle a bit with higher FSBs, and we began to see some interesting twists.P35 seem to favor large cache processors, according to the results we saw with our Sciencemark Membench. Naturally we are intrigued - how does this peculiar behavior in other applications. We turned to SuperPi 8M for our second test.Core 2 Duo E6300 & P965
| 7x266 MHz SPD | 7x333 MHz | 6x400 MHz | 7x400 MHz | |
| Iterations | seconds | seconds | seconds | seconds |
| 1 | 15 | 13 | 13 | 11 |
| 2 | 30 | 25 | 24 | 21 |
| 3 | 44 | 37 | 36 | 31 |
| 4 | 58 | 49 | 47 | 42 |
| 5 | 72 | 61 | 59 | 52 |
| 6 | 86 | 73 | 70 | 62 |
| 7 | 100 | 85 | 82 | 72 |
| 8 | 114 | 97 | 94 | 82 |
| 9 | 128 | 109 | 105 | 93 |
| 10 | 142 | 121 | 117 | 103 |
| 11 | 156 | 132 | 128 | 113 |
| 12 | 170 | 145 | 140 | 123 |
| 13 | 184 | 157 | 151 | 133 |
| 14 | 198 | 168 | 163 | 144 |
| 15 | 212 | 180 | 174 | 154 |
| 16 | 226 | 192 | 186 | 164 |
| 17 | 240 | 204 | 197 | 174 |
| 18 | 254 | 216 | 209 | 184 |
| 19 | 268 | 228 | 220 | 194 |
| 20 | 282 | 239 | 231 | 204 |
| 21 | 295 | 251 | 242 | 214 |
| 22 | 307 | 261 | 252 | 223 |
Core 2 Duo E6300 & P35 - DDR2
| 7x266 MHz SPD | 7x333 MHz | 6x400 MHz | 7x400 MHz | |
| Iterations | seconds | seconds | seconds | seconds |
| 1 | 16 | 13 | 13 | 11 |
| 2 | 30 | 25 | 25 | 21 |
| 3 | 44 | 37 | 36 | 31 |
| 4 | 58 | 49 | 47 | 41 |
| 5 | 72 | 61 | 59 | 51 |
| 6 | 86 | 72 | 70 | 61 |
| 7 | 100 | 84 | 81 | 72 |
| 8 | 114 | 96 | 93 | 82 |
| 9 | 129 | 108 | 104 | 92 |
| 10 | 143 | 120 | 116 | 102 |
| 11 | 157 | 132 | 127 | 112 |
| 12 | 171 | 143 | 138 | 122 |
| 13 | 185 | 155 | 149 | 132 |
| 14 | 199 | 167 | 161 | 142 |
| 15 | 213 | 179 | 172 | 152 |
| 16 | 227 | 191 | 183 | 163 |
| 17 | 241 | 202 | 195 | 173 |
| 18 | 255 | 214 | 209 | 183 |
| 19 | 269 | 226 | 217 | 193 |
| 20 | 283 | 237 | 228 | 202 |
| 21 | 296 | 248 | 239 | 212 |
| 22 | 308 | 259 | 249 | 221 |
Core 2 Duo E6300 & P35 - DDR3
| 7x266 MHz SPD | 7x333 MHz | 6x400 MHz | 7x400 MHz | |
| Iterations | seconds | seconds | seconds | seconds |
| 1 | 15 | 13 | 13 | 11 |
| 2 | 30 | 25 | 24 | 21 |
| 3 | 44 | 37 | 35 | 31 |
| 4 | 58 | 49 | 47 | 42 |
| 5 | 72 | 61 | 59 | 52 |
| 6 | 86 | 72 | 70 | 62 |
| 7 | 100 | 84 | 81 | 72 |
| 8 | 114 | 96 | 93 | 83 |
| 9 | 128 | 108 | 104 | 93 |
| 10 | 142 | 120 | 116 | 103 |
| 11 | 156 | 132 | 127 | 113 |
| 12 | 170 | 144 | 139 | 123 |
| 13 | 184 | 155 | 150 | 134 |
| 14 | 199 | 167 | 162 | 144 |
| 15 | 213 | 179 | 173 | 154 |
| 16 | 227 | 191 | 184 | 164 |
| 17 | 241 | 203 | 196 | 174 |
| 18 | 255 | 214 | 207 | 184 |
| 19 | 268 | 226 | 219 | 194 |
| 20 | 282 | 238 | 230 | 204 |
| 21 | 295 | 249 | 240 | 214 |
| 22 | 308 | 259 | 250 | 223 |
The difference is small, but its there even at default clocks. As we increase FSB and clock, the difference increased from 1 to 2 / 3 seconds. Much like we saw with Sciencemark Membench, we did not see much of a difference between P965 and P35 with the Core 2 Duo E6300. Now, let's see how does the same test do fare with E6550.
Core 2 Duo E6550 & P965
| 7x333 MHz | 6x400 MHz | 7x400 MHz | |
| Iterations | seconds | seconds | seconds |
| 1 | 13 | 13 | 11 |
| 2 | 25 | 24 | 21 |
| 3 | 37 | 36 | 31 |
| 4 | 48 | 47 | 41 |
| 5 | 60 | 58 | 51 |
| 6 | 72 | 70 | 61 |
| 7 | 83 | 81 | 71 |
| 8 | 95 | 93 | 81 |
| 9 | 107 | 104 | 91 |
| 10 | 119 | 115 | 101 |
| 11 | 130 | 127 | 111 |
| 12 | 142 | 138 | 121 |
| 13 | 154 | 149 | 131 |
| 14 | 165 | 161 | 141 |
| 15 | 177 | 174 | 151 |
| 16 | 189 | 183 | 161 |
| 17 | 200 | 195 | 171 |
| 18 | 212 | 206 | 181 |
| 19 | 223 | 217 | 191 |
| 20 | 235 | 228 | 201 |
| 21 | 246 | 239 | 210 |
| 22 | 266 | 249 | 219 |
Core 2 Duo E6550 & P35 - DDR2
| 7x333 MHz | 6x400 MHz | 7x400 MHz | |
| Iterations | seconds | seconds | seconds |
| 1 | 13 | 12 | 11 |
| 2 | 24 | 23 | 21 |
| 3 | 36 | 35 | 31 |
| 4 | 47 | 46 | 41 |
| 5 | 59 | 57 | 51 |
| 6 | 71 | 68 | 61 |
| 7 | 82 | 79 | 72 |
| 8 | 94 | 91 | 82 |
| 9 | 105 | 102 | 92 |
| 10 | 117 | 113 | 102 |
| 11 | 129 | 124 | 112 |
| 12 | 140 | 138 | 122 |
| 13 | 152 | 147 | 132 |
| 14 | 164 | 158 | 142 |
| 15 | 175 | 169 | 152 |
| 16 | 187 | 180 | 163 |
| 17 | 198 | 191 | 173 |
| 18 | 210 | 202 | 183 |
| 19 | 221 | 213 | 193 |
| 20 | 233 | 224 | 202 |
| 21 | 244 | 235 | 212 |
| 22 | 254 | 245 | 221 |
Core 2 Duo E6550 & P35 - DDR3
| 7x333 MHz | 6x400 MHz | 7x400 MHz | |
| Iterations | seconds | seconds | seconds |
| 1 | 13 | 12 | 11 |
| 2 | 24 | 24 | 21 |
| 3 | 36 | 35 | 31 |
| 4 | 48 | 47 | 42 |
| 5 | 59 | 59 | 52 |
| 6 | 71 | 69 | 62 |
| 7 | 83 | 81 | 72 |
| 8 | 94 | 92 | 83 |
| 9 | 106 | 103 | 93 |
| 10 | 118 | 115 | 103 |
| 11 | 129 | 126 | 113 |
| 12 | 141 | 138 | 123 |
| 13 | 153 | 149 | 134 |
| 14 | 164 | 160 | 144 |
| 15 | 176 | 172 | 154 |
| 16 | 188 | 183 | 164 |
| 17 | 199 | 194 | 174 |
| 18 | 211 | 205 | 184 |
| 19 | 222 | 217 | 194 |
| 20 | 234 | 228 | 204 |
| 21 | 245 | 238 | 214 |
| 22 | 255 | 248 | 223 |
Needless to say, the results here are pretty interesting. Look at the difference at E6550 default FSB between the P965 and P35 - thats 11 to 12 seconds, definitely far bigger than the 2 second difference we saw between both chipsets with E6300 on the same speed (7x333 MHz). The lack of asynchronous memory setting support for 1333 MHz FSB processor on the P965 really hurt its performance. At 333 MHz the difference is smaller - only about 4 seconds. At 400 MHz FSB, we saw the difference between P965 and P35 dwindle to 2 seconds. At this speed, the E6300 at 2.8 GHz is actually neck to neck with the E6550 at the same clock - if you're using a P35 equipped motherboard with DDR2 and DDR3. The fastest combination? The E6550 with P965 - 2 seconds faster at 219 seconds.
[Previous Page]
[Go to top]
[Next Page]