SW:
KOTOR - Endar Spire, 1024 x 768, 32 bit
ASUS EN7900GTX
Gigabyte 7900GTX
Leadtek PX7900GTX
SW:
KOTOR - Endar Spire, 1280 x 1024, 32 bit
ASUS EN7900GTX
Gigabyte 7900GTX
Leadtek PX7900GTX
SW:
KOTOR - Endar Spire, 1600 x 1200, 32 bit
ASUS EN7900GTX
Gigabyte 7900GTX
Leadtek PX7900GTX
Due to the nature of this benchmark, much of the differences we're seeing here are pretty much normal variations between runs. So, It's pretty hard to see a trend here like we saw earlier with Homeworld 2 and Richard Burns Rally. Most of the time we're system limited here, except when smoke and explosions fills the screen - the minimum fps. The three cards are pretty much equal in this regard, though the Leadtek PX7900GTX is significantly slower at 1600 x 1200 with default settings. Once we enable AA and AF, we saw a similar trend except this time the Leadtek PX7900GTX seems faster at 1280 x 1024.
Brothers
in Arms - Chapter 1, 1024 x 768, 32 bit
ASUS EN7900GTX
Gigabyte 7900GTX
Leadtek PX7900GTX
Brothers
in Arms - Chapter 1, 1280 x 1024, 32
bit
ASUS EN7900GTX
Gigabyte 7900GTX
Leadtek PX7900GTX
Brothers
in Arms - Chapter 1, 1600 x 1200, 32
bit
ASUS EN7900GTX
Gigabyte 7900GTX
Leadtek PX7900GTX
Just like SW: KOTOR, differences between runs slightly complicates matters. The differences we're seeing here range from significant to hardly any difference at all (1 to 20 fps). At 1024 x 768, the Gigabyte GeForce 7900GTX seems to be the slowest of the three. However,it's very likely there are other factors contributing to the differences here - normal variations and system related factors. At 1280 x 1024, the Gigabyte GeForce 7900GTX once again seems to be the faster of the three, however once we hit 1600 x 1200, all three cards offer the same level of performance.
[Previous Page]
[Go to top]
[Next Page]