Serious
Sam II - Greendale, 1024 x 768, 32 bit
ASUS EN7900GT TOP
Gigabyte 7900GT TurboForce
Leadtek PX7900GT Extreme
MSI NX7900GT
Serious
Sam II - Greendale, 1280 x 960, 32 bit
ASUS EN7900GT TOP
Gigabyte 7900GT TurboForce
Leadtek PX7900GT Extreme
MSI NX7900GT
Serious
Sam II - Greendale, 1600 x 1200, 32 bit
ASUS EN7900GT TOP
Gigabyte 7900GT TurboForce
Leadtek PX7900GT Extreme
MSI NX7900GT
No surprises here. We can already see the telltale signs of lower frame rates on the NX7900GT at 1024 x 768, which becomes more noticeable at 1280 x 960 and 1600 x 1200. The higher clocked ASUS EN7900GT TOP, Leadtek PX7900GT Extreme and Gigabyte GeForce 7900GT TurboForce is fast enough to barely pass the minimum 30 fps mark at 1600 x 1200 while the NX7900GT goes below 30 fps more than once throughout the benchmark. Looks like an increase in clock is more 'appreciated' by new games - probably because we're seeing much lower frame rates than in older, DirectX 8 games. A 3 fps difference between 60 and 63 fps is less noticeable than the same difference between 27 and 30 fps.
[Previous Page]
[Go to top]
[Next Page]