Tech-Hounds.com

Because gamers play games, not benchmarks





F1 Career Challenge - Custom Replay, 1024 x 768, 32 bit
ASUS
AX700
Pro
Gigabyte
X700
Pro
MSI
RX700
Pro
59
88.5
110
42 (4xAA, 16x AF)
54.5 (4xAA, 16x AF)
66 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
58
88.2
110
40 (4xAA, 16x AF)
56.7 (4xAA, 16x AF)
69 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
57
88.5
110
40 (4xAA, 16x AF)
53.9 (4xAA, 16x AF)
65 (4xAA, 16x AF)
F1 Career Challenge - Custom Replay, 1280 x 1024, 32 bit
ASUS
AX700
Pro
Gigabyte
X700
Pro
MSI
RX700
Pro
59
88.5
110
31 (4xAA, 16x AF)
42.7 (4xAA, 16x AF)
54 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
58
86.7
107
33 (4xAA, 16x AF)
44.5 (4xAA, 16x AF)
55 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
57
83
100
30 (4xAA, 16x AF)
40.9 (4xAA, 16x AF)
51 (4xAA, 16x AF)
F1 Career Challenge - Custom Replay, 1600 x 1200, 32 bit
ASUS
AX700
Pro
Gigabyte
X700
Pro
MSI
RX700
Pro
48
67.2
81
22 (4xAA, 16x AF)
30.9 (4xAA, 16x AF)
40 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
49
69.2
83
23 (4xAA, 16x AF)
32.7 (4xAA, 16x AF)
42 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
44
61.8
74
20 (4xAA, 16x AF)
29 (4xAA, 16x AF)
36 (4xAA, 16x AF)

We could see that all boards are again quite evenly matched. We don't see that much difference between the cards until we hit 1600 x 1200, 32 bit. Under 4x AA and 16x AF, the situation is similar. Even the MSI RX700 Pro TD128E have just enough pixel processing power to push this game at 1600 x 1200, 32 bit under 4x AA and 16x AF. The ASUS EAX700 Pro 256 MB and Gigabyte X700 Pro 256 MB fares better, but not by much. Remember that the minimum fps is experienced on the starting lane (there are 22 cars in all). Most of the time, you're only be looking at two to three cars at most.

Nascar 2003 - Custom Replay, 1024 x 768, 32 bit
ASUS
AX700
Pro
Gigabyte
X700
Pro
MSI
RX700
Pro
43
62.2
108
42 (4xAA, 16x AF)
60.6 (4xAA, 16x AF)
107 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
43
62.1
109
42 (4xAA, 16x AF)
60.6 (4xAA, 16x AF)
106 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
43
61.9
108
42 (4xAA, 16x AF)
60.6 (4xAA, 16x AF)
107 (4xAA, 16x AF)
Nascar 2003 - Custom Replay, 1280 x 1024, 32 bit
ASUS
AX700
Pro
Gigabyte
X700
Pro
MSI
RX700
Pro
41
59.5
108
40 (4xAA, 16x AF)
55.2 (4xAA, 16x AF)
82 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
41
59.4
108
40 (4xAA, 16x AF)
56.6 (4xAA, 16x AF)
91 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
41
59.5
108
39 (4xAA, 16x AF)
54.1 (4xAA, 16x AF)
78 (4xAA, 16x AF)
Nascar 2003 - Custom Replay, 1600 x 1200, 32 bit
ASUS
AX700
Pro
Gigabyte
X700
Pro
MSI
RX700
Pro
39
56.8
107
31 (4xAA, 16x AF)
42.7 (4xAA, 16x AF)
60 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
39
57.2
107
34 (4xAA, 16x AF)
46.8 (4xAA, 16x AF)
67 (4xAA, 16x AF)
.
39
57.1
99
28 (4xAA, 16x AF)
39.9 (4xAA, 16x AF)
56 (4xAA, 16x AF)

Again the same situation with Nascar. All boards can push the game at very comfortable frame rates up to 1600x1200, 32 bit. We're basically system limited here, so we need to turn on AA and AF to push these cards. Only under 1600x1200, 32 bit with 4x AA and 16x AF are we seeing a max 17 % performance difference between the cards. The MSI RX700 Pro TD128E is slightly slower, with minimum frame rates below 30 fps. The performance difference between the cards are more likely caused by speeds rather than capacity.

[Previous Page]
[Go to top]
[Next Page]
Disclaimer and Privacy policy.