Tech-Hounds.com

Because gamers play games, not benchmarks






Serious Sam II - Greendale, 1024 x 768, 32 bit
Leadtek PX8800GTS TDH 320
ASUS EN8800GTS 320
Gigabyte NX8800GTS 320
MSI NX8800GTS 320 OC Edition
94
114.9
154
90 (4x AA 16x AF)
103.04 (4x AA 16x AF)
128 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
92
112.42
152
91 (4x AA 16x AF)
103.55 (4x AA 16x AF)
129 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
91
113.01
150
89 (4x AA 16x AF)
102.73 (4x AA 16x AF)
128 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
94
114.44
152
94 (4x AA 16x AF)
108.84 (4x AA 16x AF)
136 (4x AA 16x AF)
Serious Sam II - Greendale, 1280 x 960, 32 bit
Leadtek PX8800GTS TDH 320
ASUS EN8800GTS 320
Gigabyte NX8800GTS 320
MSI NX8800GTS 320 OC Edition
94
110.86
144
68 (4x AA 16x AF)
79.42 (4x AA 16x AF)
103 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
94
110.03
143
68 (4x AA 16x AF)
79.66 (4x AA 16x AF)
103 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
93
108.82
139
68 (4x AA 16x AF)
78.99 (4x AA 16x AF)
102 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
94
112.81
150
75 (4x AA 16x AF)
87.12 (4x AA 16x AF)
112 (4x AA 16x AF)
Serious Sam II - Greendale, 1600 x 1200, 32 bit
Leadtek PX8800GTS TDH 320
ASUS EN8800GTS 320
Gigabyte NX8800GTS 320
MSI NX8800GTS 320 OC Edition
82
94.13
116
50 (4x AA 16x AF)
58.43 (4x AA 16x AF)
76 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
82
94.38
116
50 (4x AA 16x AF)
58.88 (4x AA 16x AF)
77 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
80
92.79
114
50 (4x AA 16x AF)
58.15 (4x AA 16x AF)
76 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
91
103.33
128
55 (4x AA 16x AF)
64.37 (4x AA 16x AF)
85 (4x AA 16x AF)

We're system limited at 1024 x 768. It's not until we hit 1280 x 960 do we see these cards have the chance to stretch their legs. The MSI NX880GTS OC Edition takes the lead due to its clock advantage. It's about 10 percent faster than the other reference clocked cards. The other cards - the ASUS EN8800GTS, Gigabyte NX8800GTS and Leadtek PX8800GTS TDH are practically indistinguishable from each other in this game.

[Previous Page]
[Go to top]
[Next Page]
Disclaimer and Privacy policy.