Tech-Hounds.com

Because gamers play games, not benchmarks






Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - Grass Test, 1024 x 768, 32 bit
Leadtek PX8800GTS TDH 320
ASUS EN8800GTS 320
Gigabyte NX8800GTS 320
MSI NX8800GTS 320 OC Edition
59
70.63
91
40 (4x AA 16x AF)
49.81 (4x AA 16x AF)
73 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
50
68.53
96
41 (4x AA 16x AF)
49.34 (4x AA 16x AF)
70 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
62
71.43
82
41 (4x AA 16x AF)
49.74 (4x AA 16x AF)
69 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
61
76.23
105
46 (4x AA 16x AF)
55.18 (4x AA 16x AF)
75 (4x AA 16x AF)
Minimum fps
Average fps
Maximum fps
Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - Grass Test, 1280 x 1024, 32 bit
Leadtek PX8800GTS TDH 320
ASUS EN8800GTS 320
Gigabyte NX8800GTS 320
MSI NX8800GTS 320 OC Edition
55
60.87
79
31 (4x AA 16x AF)
37.97 (4x AA 16x AF)
61 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
55
59.98
81
34 (4x AA 16x AF)
41.23 (4x AA 16x AF)
65 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
51
59.98
81
33 (4x AA 16x AF)
39.08 (4x AA 16x AF)
54 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
59
66.36
84
38 (4x AA 16x AF)
44.45 (4x AA 16x AF)
62 (4x AA 16x AF)
Minimum fps
Average fps
Maximum fps
Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion - Grass Test, 1600 x 1200, 32 bit
Leadtek PX8800GTS TDH 320
ASUS EN8800GTS 320
Gigabyte NX8800GTS 320
MSI NX8800GTS 320 OC Edition
43
48.35
63
25 (4x AA 16x AF)
32.54 (4x AA 16x AF)
43 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
40
48.35
66
26 (4x AA 16x AF)
31.76 (4x AA 16x AF)
49 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
40
47.8
66
26 (4x AA 16x AF)
31.46 (4x AA 16x AF)
50 (4x AA 16x AF)
.
46
53.71
71
29 (4x AA 16x AF)
34.32 (4x AA 16x AF)
49 (4x AA 16x AF)
Minimum fps
Average fps
Maximum fps

Remember that Oblivion benchmarks are more susceptible to higher normal variations between runs than the other benchmarks in our benchmark suite. The clock advantage of the MSI NX8800GTS OC Edition is still not enough to push Oblivion at 1600 x 1200 with AA and AF above 30 fps all the time, but is enough to provide noticeable differences at 1280 x 1024 by (again) about 10 percent.

[Previous Page]
[Go to top]
[Next Page]
Disclaimer and Privacy policy.